You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Millikanの機能理論から見た「デザイン」(第2部:メタデザインへの挑戦,デザイン学:メタデザインへの挑戦)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Special issue of Japanese Society for the Science of Design, June 2011
|
DOI | 10.11247/jssds.18.1_54 |
Authors |
下嶋 篤 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2020.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Special issue of Japanese Society for the Science of Design
#20
of 46 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,814
of 122,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Special issue of Japanese Society for the Science of Design
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 26 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.