| Title |
Use of human-made nesting structures by wild bees in an urban environment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Insect Conservation, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10841-016-9857-y |
| Authors |
Laura Fortel, Mickaël Henry, Laurent Guilbaud, Hugues Mouret, Bernard E. Vaissière |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Guinea-Bissau | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 295 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 61 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 55 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 12% |
| Researcher | 30 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 31 | 10% |
| Unknown | 73 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 126 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 57 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Unknown | 83 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,073,844
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Conservation
#38
of 738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,128
of 315,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Conservation
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.