| Title |
The effect of high tibial osteotomy on the results of total knee arthroplasty: a matched case control study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-8-74 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tom M van Raaij, Wouter Bakker, Max Reijman, Jan AN Verhaar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 22% |
| Unknown | 7 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 53% |
| Engineering | 4 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2016.
All research outputs
#4,190,110
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#833
of 4,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,562
of 67,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.