↓ Skip to main content

Effects of l-arginine supplementation on blood flow, oxidative stress status and exercise responses in young adults with uncomplicated type I diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
Title
Effects of l-arginine supplementation on blood flow, oxidative stress status and exercise responses in young adults with uncomplicated type I diabetes
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00394-012-0404-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Paula Trussardi Fayh, Mauricio Krause, Josianne Rodrigues-Krause, Jerri Luiz Ribeiro, Jorge Pinto Ribeiro, Rogério Friedman, José Cláudio Fonseca Moreira, Alvaro Reischak-Oliveira

Abstract

Vascular disease is the principal cause of death and disability in patients with diabetes, and endothelial dysfunction seems to be the major cause in its pathogenesis. Since L-arginine levels are diminished in conditions such as type 1 and type 2 diabetes, in this work we aimed to verify the effects of L-arginine supplementation (7 g/day) over the endothelial function and oxidative stress markers in young male adults with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes. We also investigated the influences of L-arginine administration on vascular/oxidative stress responses to an acute bout of exercise.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 206 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 36 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 11%
Student > Master 22 11%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Postgraduate 13 6%
Other 49 23%
Unknown 48 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 22%
Sports and Recreations 40 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Other 26 12%
Unknown 57 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2013.
All research outputs
#3,664,789
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#772
of 2,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,229
of 164,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#15
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.