| Title |
Staff Turnover in Assertive Community Treatment (Act) Teams: The Role of Team Climate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10488-016-0740-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xi Zhu, Douglas R. Wholey, Cindy Cain, Nabil Natafgi |
| Abstract |
Staff turnover in Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) teams can result in interrupted services and diminished support for clients. This paper examines the effect of team climate, defined as team members' shared perceptions of their work environment, on turnover and individual outcomes that mediate the climate-turnover relationship. We focus on two climate dimensions: safety and quality climate and constructive conflict climate. Using survey data collected from 26 ACT teams, our analyses highlight the importance of safety and quality climate in reducing turnover, and job satisfaction as the main mediator linking team climate to turnover. The findings offer practical implications for team management. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 21% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 10 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,866,480
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#286
of 670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,402
of 339,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.