↓ Skip to main content

Real-time in vivo dosimetry in high dose rate prostate brachytherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Radiotherapy & Oncology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Real-time in vivo dosimetry in high dose rate prostate brachytherapy
Published in
Radiotherapy & Oncology, May 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.05.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josh Mason, Arielle Mamo, Bashar Al-Qaisieh, Ann M. Henry, Peter Bownes

Abstract

Single fraction treatments of 15Gy or 19Gy are common in HDR prostate brachytherapy. In vivo dosimetry (IVD) is therefore important to ensure patient safety. This study assesses clinical IVD and investigates error detection thresholds for real-time treatment monitoring. IVD was performed for 40 treatments planned using intra-operative trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) with a MOSFET inserted into an additional needle. Post-treatment TRUS images were acquired for 20 patients to assess needle movement. Monte Carlo simulations of treatment plans were performed for 10 patients to assess impact of heterogeneities. Per-needle and total plan uncertainties were estimated and retrospectively applied to the measured data as error detection thresholds. The mean measured dose was -6.4% compared to prediction (range +5.1% to -15.2%). Needle movement and heterogeneities accounted for -1.8% and -1.6% of this difference respectively (mean values for the patients analysed). Total plan uncertainty (k=2) ranged from 11% to 17% and per needle uncertainty (k=2) ranged from 18% to 110% (mean 31%). One out of 40 plans and 5% of needles were outside k=2 error detection threshold. IVD showed good agreement with predicted dose within measurement uncertainties, providing reassurance in the accuracy of dose delivery. Thresholds for real-time error detection should be calculated on an individual plan/needle basis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 28%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 14 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Engineering 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2016.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Radiotherapy & Oncology
#4,099
of 4,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#306,331
of 350,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiotherapy & Oncology
#62
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.