| Title |
Digital contact tracing for COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.200922 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert A Kleinman, Colin Merkel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 40% |
| Portugal | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 27% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 312 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 11% |
| Researcher | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 59 | 19% |
| Unknown | 108 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 36 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 7% |
| Engineering | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 57 | 18% |
| Unknown | 124 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2021.
All research outputs
#869,198
of 25,101,232 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1,308
of 9,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,839
of 401,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#46
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,101,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.