↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin D and multiple sclerosis: a critical review and recommendations on treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neurologica Belgica, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 809)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin D and multiple sclerosis: a critical review and recommendations on treatment
Published in
Acta Neurologica Belgica, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13760-012-0108-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alireza Faridar, Ghazaleh Eskandari, Mohammad Ali Sahraian, Alireza Minagar, Amirreza Azimi

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated and degenerative disease of nervous system, which affects mostly young adults. Vitamin D deficiency is a well-known environmental risk factor for MS and is considerable in terms of immediate clinical implications. In addition to its classical action on regulation of bone homeostasis, vitamin D may have a potent impact on cytokine profiles and neuro-inflammation. Given the immunomodulatory effects of vitamin D and its high rate of deficiency in MS patients, prescribing vitamin D is a remarkable issue in MS. The results from several experimental and clinical studies indicate that vitamin D supplementation may ameliorate the inflammation during the relapse phase and attenuate disease progression. We present the experimental and clinical studies, which assessed the effects of vitamin D on the pathophysiology, prevalence and management of MS. The authors also discuss current recommendations on prescription of this vitamin to MS patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 84 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 22%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 20 23%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Neuroscience 6 7%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 15 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,012,091
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurologica Belgica
#26
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,289
of 167,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurologica Belgica
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.