↓ Skip to main content

The Banff 2019 Kidney Meeting Report (I): Updates on and clarification of criteria for T cell– and antibody-mediated rejection

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Transplantation, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
103 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
464 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
352 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Banff 2019 Kidney Meeting Report (I): Updates on and clarification of criteria for T cell– and antibody-mediated rejection
Published in
American Journal of Transplantation, May 2020
DOI 10.1111/ajt.15898
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandre Loupy, Mark Haas, Candice Roufosse, Maarten Naesens, Benjamin Adam, Marjan Afrouzian, Enver Akalin, Nada Alachkar, Serena Bagnasco, Jan U. Becker, Lynn D. Cornell, Marian C. Clahsen‐van Groningen, Anthony J. Demetris, Duska Dragun, Jean‐Paul Duong van Huyen, Alton B. Farris, Agnes B. Fogo, Ian W. Gibson, Denis Glotz, Juliette Gueguen, Zeljko Kikic, Nicolas Kozakowski, Edward Kraus, Carmen Lefaucheur, Helen Liapis, Roslyn B. Mannon, Robert A. Montgomery, Brian J. Nankivell, Volker Nickeleit, Peter Nickerson, Marion Rabant, Lorraine Racusen, Parmjeet Randhawa, Blaise Robin, Ivy A. Rosales, Ruth Sapir‐Pichhadze, Carrie A. Schinstock, Daniel Seron, Harsharan K. Singh, Rex N. Smith, Mark D. Stegall, Adriana Zeevi, Kim Solez, Robert B. Colvin, Michael Mengel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 103 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 352 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 7%
Other 25 7%
Student > Master 22 6%
Other 67 19%
Unknown 144 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 34%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Psychology 7 2%
Other 33 9%
Unknown 156 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2023.
All research outputs
#544,296
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Transplantation
#113
of 5,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,121
of 432,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Transplantation
#6
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.