You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The human tumor microbiome is composed of tumor type–specific intracellular bacteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aay9189 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah Nejman, Ilana Livyatan, Garold Fuks, Nancy Gavert, Yaara Zwang, Leore T Geller, Aviva Rotter-Maskowitz, Roi Weiser, Giuseppe Mallel, Elinor Gigi, Arnon Meltser, Gavin M Douglas, Iris Kamer, Vancheswaran Gopalakrishnan, Tali Dadosh, Smadar Levin-Zaidman, Sofia Avnet, Tehila Atlan, Zachary A Cooper, Reetakshi Arora, Alexandria P Cogdill, Md Abdul Wadud Khan, Gabriel Ologun, Yuval Bussi, Adina Weinberger, Maya Lotan-Pompan, Ofra Golani, Gili Perry, Merav Rokah, Keren Bahar-Shany, Elisa A Rozeman, Christian U Blank, Anat Ronai, Ron Shaoul, Amnon Amit, Tatiana Dorfman, Ran Kremer, Zvi R Cohen, Sagi Harnof, Tali Siegal, Einav Yehuda-Shnaidman, Einav Nili Gal-Yam, Hagit Shapira, Nicola Baldini, Morgan G I Langille, Alon Ben-Nun, Bella Kaufman, Aviram Nissan, Talia Golan, Maya Dadiani, Keren Levanon, Jair Bar, Shlomit Yust-Katz, Iris Barshack, Daniel S Peeper, Dan J Raz, Eran Segal, Jennifer A Wargo, Judith Sandbank, Noam Shental, Ravid Straussman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,050 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 209 | 20% |
| Spain | 52 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 45 | 4% |
| Chile | 37 | 4% |
| Germany | 32 | 3% |
| Australia | 32 | 3% |
| Canada | 23 | 2% |
| France | 19 | 2% |
| Israel | 17 | 2% |
| Other | 152 | 14% |
| Unknown | 432 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 610 | 58% |
| Scientists | 365 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 57 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 17 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,651 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1651 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 269 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 234 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 148 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 147 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 85 | 5% |
| Other | 270 | 16% |
| Unknown | 498 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 374 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 171 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 160 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 138 | 8% |
| Engineering | 41 | 2% |
| Other | 202 | 12% |
| Unknown | 565 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 995. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#16,606
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Science
#824
of 83,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#824
of 432,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#52
of 970 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 970 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.