Title |
Auricular acupuncture for pain relief after ambulatory knee surgery: a randomized trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, January 2007
|
DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.060875 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Taras I Usichenko, Sven Kuchling, Torsten Witstruck, Dragan Pavlovic, Maria Zach, Andre Hofer, Harry Merk, Christian Lehmann, Michael Wendt |
Abstract |
Auricular acupuncture is a promising method for postoperative pain relief. However, there is no evidence for its use after ambulatory surgery. Our aim was to test whether auricular acupuncture is better than invasive needle control for complementary analgesia after ambulatory knee surgery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Canada | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 89 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
Researcher | 12 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 12% |
Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Other | 24 | 26% |
Unknown | 15 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 46% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 10% |
Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,444,604
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#2,714
of 8,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,991
of 159,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#14
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.