↓ Skip to main content

Introducing PIONEER: a project to harness big data in prostate cancer research

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Urology, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
39 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Introducing PIONEER: a project to harness big data in prostate cancer research
Published in
Nature Reviews Urology, May 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41585-020-0324-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad Imran Omar, Monique J. Roobol, Maria J. Ribal, Thomas Abbott, Paul-Michael Agapow, Sonia Araujo, Alex Asiimwe, Charles Auffray, Irina Balaur, Katharina Beyer, Chiara Bernini, Anders Bjartell, Alberto Briganti, John-Edward Butler-Ransohoff, Riccardo Campi, Marinel Cavelaars, Bertrand De Meulder, Zsuzsanna Devecseri, Marc Dietrich Voss, Konstantinos Dimitropoulos, Susan Evans-Axelsson, Billy Franks, Louise Fullwood, Denis Horgan, Emma Jane Smith, Amit Kiran, Kati Kivinummi, Mark Lambrecht, Doron Lancet, Peter Lindgren, Sara MacLennan, Steven MacLennan, Maria Manuela Nogueira, Fredrik Moen, Maxim Moinat, Kishore Papineni, Christian Reich, Kristin Reiche, Stijn Rogiers, Claudio Sartini, Kees van Bochove, Femke van Diggelen, Mieke Van Hemelrijck, Hein Van Poppel, Jihong Zong, James N’Dow

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Other 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 26 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 22%
Computer Science 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 27 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,444,967
of 25,225,928 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Urology
#138
of 2,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,903
of 401,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Urology
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,225,928 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.