↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Prison Status on HIV-Related Risk Behaviors

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Impact of Prison Status on HIV-Related Risk Behaviors
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10461-009-9570-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela L. Hudson, Adeline Nyamathi, Debika Bhattacharya, Elizabeth Marlow, Steven Shoptaw, Mary Marfisee, Barbara Leake

Abstract

Baseline data were collected to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions on completion of the hepatitis A and B vaccine series among 664 sheltered and street-based homeless adults who were: (a) homeless; (b) recently (<1 year) discharged from prison; (c) discharged 1 year or more; and (d) never incarcerated. Group differences at baseline were assessed for socio-demographic characteristics, drug and alcohol use, sexual activity, mental health and public assistance. More than one-third of homeless persons (38%) reported prison time and 16% of the sample had been recently discharged from prison. Almost half of persons who were discharged from prison at least 1 year ago reported daily use of drugs and alcohol over the past 6 months compared to about 1 in 5 among those who were recently released from prison. As risk for HCV and HIV co-infection continues among homeless ex-offenders, HIV/HCV prevention efforts are needed for this population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 126 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 42 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 21%
Social Sciences 19 15%
Psychology 18 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 45 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2012.
All research outputs
#4,040,514
of 24,635,922 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#571
of 3,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,759
of 101,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,635,922 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.