↓ Skip to main content

Uncertainty in measurement and total error – are they so incompatible?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uncertainty in measurement and total error – are they so incompatible?
Published in
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, May 2016
DOI 10.1515/cclm-2016-0314
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ian Farrance, Tony Badrick, Kenneth A. Sikaris

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 15%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Master 3 15%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2016.
All research outputs
#20,356,726
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
#1,626
of 2,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,124
of 354,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
#27
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,988 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.