↓ Skip to main content

Ethical Standards for Stockbrokers: Fiduciary or Suitability?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Ethical Standards for Stockbrokers: Fiduciary or Suitability?
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10551-012-1362-y
Authors

James J. Angel, Douglas McCabe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 14%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 18 41%
Computer Science 3 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 7%
Philosophy 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 8 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2019.
All research outputs
#13,867,609
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,805
of 2,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,204
of 164,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.