You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Centrifugal microfluidics for cell analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.06.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Burger, Daniel Kirby, Macdara Glynn, Charles Nwankire, Mary O'Sullivan, Jonathan Siegrist, David Kinahan, Gerson Aguirre, Gregor Kijanka, Robert A Gorkin, Jens Ducrée |
| Abstract |
Over the past two decades, centrifugal microfluidic systems have successfully demonstrated their capability for robust, high-performance liquid handling to enable modular, multi-purpose lab-on-a-chip platforms for a wide range of life-science applications. Beyond the handling of homogeneous liquids, the unique, rotationally controlled centrifugal actuation has proven to be specifically advantageous for performing cell and particle handling and assays. In this review we discuss technologies to implement two important steps for cell handling, namely separation and capturing/counting. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 169 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 36% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 17% |
| Researcher | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 70 | 39% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 22 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 16 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Chemical Biology
#903
of 1,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,019
of 177,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Chemical Biology
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,926 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.