| Title |
Evidence for Limited Early Spread of COVID-19 Within the United States, January–February 2020
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.15585/mmwr.mm6922e1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle A. Jorden, Sarah L. Rudman, Elsa Villarino, Stacey Hoferka, Megan T. Patel, Kelley Bemis, Cristal R. Simmons, Megan Jespersen, Jenna Iberg Johnson, Elizabeth Mytty, Katherine D. Arends, Justin J. Henderson, Robert W. Mathes, Charlene X. Weng, Jeffrey Duchin, Jennifer Lenahan, Natasha Close, Trevor Bedford, Michael Boeckh, Helen Y. Chu, Janet A. Englund, Michael Famulare, Deborah A. Nickerson, Mark J. Rieder, Jay Shendure, Lea M. Starita, Gregory L. Armstrong, Jay C. Butler, Michael A. Coletta, Aaron Kite-Powell, Julu Bhatnagar, Sarah Reagan-Steiner, Suxiang Tong, Brendan Flannery, Jill M. Ferdinands, Jessie R. Chung |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 959 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 376 | 39% |
| Canada | 21 | 2% |
| Japan | 15 | 2% |
| Australia | 11 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | <1% |
| India | 8 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 44 | 5% |
| Unknown | 465 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 834 | 87% |
| Scientists | 56 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 39 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 30 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 248 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 10% |
| Researcher | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 54 | 22% |
| Unknown | 83 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 47 | 19% |
| Unknown | 100 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3573. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,567
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#73
of 4,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132
of 434,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#6
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 335.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.