↓ Skip to main content

Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic hernia repair comparing titanium-coated lightweight mesh and medium-weight composite mesh

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic hernia repair comparing titanium-coated lightweight mesh and medium-weight composite mesh
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00464-012-2425-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alfredo Moreno-Egea, Andrés Carrillo-Alcaraz, Víctor Soria-Aledo

Abstract

The use of lightweight meshes in incisional hernia repair could have beneficial effects on quality of life. This study aimed to compare a new titanium-coated lightweight mesh with a standard composite mesh after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Other 9 14%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 57%
Psychology 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 17 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2013.
All research outputs
#14,728,905
of 22,669,724 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,553
of 5,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,879
of 164,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#41
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,669,724 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,991 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.