↓ Skip to main content

Toward Mapping Daily Challenges of Living with ADHD: Maternal and Child Perspectives Using Electronic Diaries

Overview of attention for article published in Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
Title
Toward Mapping Daily Challenges of Living with ADHD: Maternal and Child Perspectives Using Electronic Diaries
Published in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, February 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10802-005-9008-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carol K. Whalen, Barbara Henker, Larry D. Jamner, Sharon S. Ishikawa, Joshua N. Floro, Ralph Swindle, Amy R. Perwien, Joseph A. Johnston

Abstract

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has an impact on the family as well as the affected child. This study developed and tested an electronic diary for mapping the challenges of everyday family life in a sample of children with ADHD being treated with pharmacotherapy. Across 7 days, mothers and children (27 ADHD; 25 non-ADHD) independently reported their moods, behaviors, and social contexts every 30 min during nonschool hours. Symptomatic behaviors and negative moods were elevated in the ADHD group, combined with maternal perceptions of lower parenting effectiveness and quality of life. Differences in the contexts of maternal anger were salient, with mothers in the ADHD group more often angry when with their children and comparison mothers more often angry when not. Although mothers' diaries were more informative, children's diaries also distinguished the two groups, especially during mornings and weekends. The need for family-wide interventions, the utility of child self-reports, and the promise of electronic diaries are discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 168 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 21%
Student > Master 23 13%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 44 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 74 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 55 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#1,352
of 2,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,003
of 170,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.