↓ Skip to main content

Genetics of psychosis; insights from views across the genome

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
14 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
194 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Genetics of psychosis; insights from views across the genome
Published in
Human Genetics, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00439-009-0703-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael C. O’Donovan, Nick J. Craddock, Michael J. Owen

Abstract

The major psychotic illnesses, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (BD), are among the most heritable common disorders, but finding specific susceptibility genes for them has not been straightforward. The reasons are widely assumed to include lack of valid phenotypic definition, absence of good theories of pathophysiology for candidate gene studies, and the involvement of many genes, each making small contributions to population risk. Within the last year or so, a number of genome wide association (GWAS) of schizophrenia and BD have been published. These have produced stronger evidence for association to specific risk loci than have earlier studies, specifically for the zinc finger binding protein 804A (ZNF804A) locus in schizophrenia and for the calcium channel, voltage-dependent, L type, alpha 1C subunit (CACNA1C) and ankyrin 3, node of Ranvier (ANK3) loci in bipolar disorder. The ZNF804A and CACNA1C loci appear to influence risk for both disorders, a finding that supports the hypothesis that schizophrenia and BD are not aetiologically distinct. In the case of schizophrenia, a number of rare copy number variants have also been detected that have fairly large effect sizes on disease risk, and that additionally influence risk of autism, mental retardation, and other neurodevelopmental disorders. The existing findings point to some likely pathophysiological mechanisms but also challenge current concepts of disease classification. They also provide grounds for optimism that larger studies will reveal more about the origins of these disorders, although currently, very little of the genetic risk of either disorder is explained.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Canada 3 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 219 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 17%
Student > Bachelor 37 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 14%
Student > Master 22 9%
Professor 15 6%
Other 50 21%
Unknown 39 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 24%
Psychology 30 13%
Neuroscience 24 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 5%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 43 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,491,622
of 25,418,993 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#200
of 2,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,785
of 122,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,418,993 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.