↓ Skip to main content

Fabry Disease: Recognition, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Neurological Features

Overview of attention for article published in Current Treatment Options in Neurology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
Title
Fabry Disease: Recognition, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Neurological Features
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Neurology, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11940-016-0414-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michela Ranieri, Gloria Bedini, Eugenio Agostino Parati, Anna Bersano

Abstract

Fabry disease is an X-linked, lysosomal storage disorder caused by a mutation in the GLA gene leading to a deficiency in alpha-galactosidase A enzyme (α-Gal A) activity, which in turn results in accumulation of globotriaosylceramide in the vascular endothelium and smooth muscle cells of different organs, including kidney and heart, finally leading to impairment or failure of organ function. The central and peripheral nervous systems are also affected leading to neurological manifestations such as cerebrovascular diseases, small fiber neuropathy (SFN), and dysautonomic disorders that may be the presenting clinical features in a proportion of patients. This review offers a complete update of all neurological aspects of Fabry disease and therapeutic options. The rarity of disease, as well as the incomplete knowledge regarding natural history, pathogenic mechanisms, and the uncertain efficacy of available therapies, make imperative the acquisition of standardized data on natural disease course. These data are fundamental for the development of new treatments better able to access the central nervous system, to bypass the neutralizing antibodies and to improve the heart and kidney function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bangladesh 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 15 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,568,929
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Current Treatment Options in Neurology
#104
of 471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,782
of 337,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Treatment Options in Neurology
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.