↓ Skip to main content

Automated Selection of Synthetic Biology Parts for Genetic Regulatory Networks

Overview of attention for article published in ACS Synthetic Biology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Automated Selection of Synthetic Biology Parts for Genetic Regulatory Networks
Published in
ACS Synthetic Biology, July 2012
DOI 10.1021/sb300032y
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Raising the level of abstraction for synthetic biology design requires solving several challenging problems, including mapping abstract designs to DNA sequences. In this paper we present the first formalism and algorithms to address this problem. The key steps of this transformation are feature matching, signal matching, and part matching. Feature matching ensures that the mapping satisfies the regulatory relationships in the abstract design. Signal matching ensures that the expression levels of functional units are compatible. Finally, part matching finds a DNA part sequence that can implement the design. Our software tool MatchMaker implements these three steps.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Belgium 3 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
India 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 89 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 36%
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Professor 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 18%
Engineering 15 15%
Computer Science 13 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 13 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2014.
All research outputs
#4,084,181
of 31,836,582 outputs
Outputs from ACS Synthetic Biology
#873
of 3,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,394
of 201,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Synthetic Biology
#12
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,836,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.