| Title |
EEG-Driven Photic Stimulation Effect on Plasma Cortisol and β-Endorphin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, September 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1026215910176 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hiroaki Kumano, Harumi Horie, Tomifusa Kuboki, Hiroyuki Suematsu, Hiroshi Sato, Mitsuo Yasushi, Tsutomu Kamei, Sumio Masumura |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 6 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2016.
All research outputs
#3,798,287
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#88
of 457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,206
of 28,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them