You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A11.中国語普通話におけるshénmeとzěnmeの声調の特異性 : 音響分析と音韻論的解釈(研究発表,音声学会2009年度(第23回)全国大会発表要旨)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, December 2009
|
DOI | 10.24467/onseikenkyu.13.3_118_3 |
Authors |
武内 真弓, 五十嵐 陽介 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 20% |
Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,267,105
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan
#11
of 118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,400
of 176,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them