You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An Invasive or Conservative Strategy in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes A Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
JACC, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.059 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michelle L. O'Donoghue, Ajay Vaidya, Rizwan Afsal, Joakim Alfredsson, William E. Boden, Eugene Braunwald, Christopher P. Cannon, Tim C. Clayton, Robbert J. de Winter, Keith A.A. Fox, Bo Lagerqvist, Peter A. McCullough, Sabina A. Murphy, Rudolf Spacek, Eva Swahn, Fons Windhausen, Marc S. Sabatine |
Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to examine an invasive or conservative strategy in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 3% |
Egypt | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Russia | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 61 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 19% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 17 | 25% |
Unknown | 7 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 70% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 11 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,046,566
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#9,022
of 16,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,365
of 176,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#51
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.