| Title |
Toxicity assessment of nanomaterials: methods and challenges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00216-010-3996-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alok Dhawan, Vyom Sharma |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 375 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 3% |
| Unknown | 344 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 105 | 28% |
| Researcher | 61 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 52 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 60 | 16% |
| Unknown | 50 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 79 | 21% |
| Chemistry | 45 | 12% |
| Environmental Science | 32 | 9% |
| Engineering | 27 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 7% |
| Other | 94 | 25% |
| Unknown | 73 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2015.
All research outputs
#5,611,796
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#931
of 9,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,650
of 107,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#14
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,818 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.