↓ Skip to main content

Estimating the Association between SF-12 Responses and EQ-5D Utility Values by Response Mapping

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Decision Making, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimating the Association between SF-12 Responses and EQ-5D Utility Values by Response Mapping
Published in
Medical Decision Making, September 2016
DOI 10.1177/0272989x05284108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alastair M. Gray, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Philip M. Clarke

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Spain 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 108 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 27%
Student > Master 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 7 6%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 28%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 21 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Mathematics 4 4%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 26 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Medical Decision Making
#520
of 1,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,468
of 346,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Decision Making
#25
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.