↓ Skip to main content

Information and Control Preferences and Their Relationship With the Knowledge Received Among European Joint Arthroplasty Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Orthopaedic Nursing, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Information and Control Preferences and Their Relationship With the Knowledge Received Among European Joint Arthroplasty Patients
Published in
Orthopaedic Nursing, May 2016
DOI 10.1097/nor.0000000000000246
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seija Klemetti, Helena Leino-Kilpi, Andreas Charalambous, Panagiota Copanitsanou, Brynja Ingadottir, Natalja Istomina, Jouko Katajisto, Mitra Unosson, Adelaida Zabalegui, Kirsi Valkeapää

Abstract

The prevalence of joint arthroplasties is increasing internationally, putting increased emphasis on patient education. This study describes information and control preferences of patients with joint arthroplasty in seven European countries, and explores their relationships with patients' received knowledge. The data (n = 1,446) were collected during 2009-2012 with the Krantz Health Opinion Survey and the Received Knowledge of Hospital Patient scale. European patients with joint arthroplasty had low preferences. Older patients had less information preferences than younger patients (p = .0001). In control preferences there were significant relationships with age (p = .021), employment in healthcare/social services (p = .033), chronic illness (p = .002), and country (p = .0001). Received knowledge of the patients did not have any relationships with information preferences. Instead, higher control preferences were associated with less received knowledge. The relationship between European joint arthroplasty patients' preferences and the knowledge they have received requires further research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iceland 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Social Sciences 4 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,119,728
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Orthopaedic Nursing
#58
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,136
of 311,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orthopaedic Nursing
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.