↓ Skip to main content

Crime and victimisation in people with intellectual disability: a case linkage study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
45 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
Title
Crime and victimisation in people with intellectual disability: a case linkage study
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-0869-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Billy C. Fogden, Stuart D. M. Thomas, Michael Daffern, James R. P. Ogloff

Abstract

Studies have suggested that people with intellectual disability are disproportionately involved in crime both as perpetrators and victims. A case linkage design used three Australian contact-level databases, from disability services, public mental health services and police records. Rates of contact, and official records of victimisation and criminal charges were compared to those in a community sample without intellectual disability. Although people with intellectual disability were significantly less likely to have an official record of victimisation and offending overall, their rates of violent and sexual victimisation and offending were significantly higher. The presence of comorbid mental illness considerably increased the likelihood of victimisation and offending; several sex differences were also noted. People with intellectual disability are at increased risk for both violent and sexual victimisation and offending. The presence of comorbid mental illness aggravates the risk of offending and victimisation. Future research should focus on a more nuanced exploration of the risks associated with intellectual disability and specific mental disorders and related indices of complexity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 171 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 55 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 50 29%
Social Sciences 24 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Philosophy 3 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 55 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,090,820
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#308
of 5,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,935
of 354,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#8
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.