↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing the benefits of local content: integrating social and economic impact assessment into procurement strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 336)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhancing the benefits of local content: integrating social and economic impact assessment into procurement strategies
Published in
Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal, September 2011
DOI 10.3152/146155111x12959673796128
Authors

Ana Maria Esteves, Mary-Anne Barclay

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 204 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 13%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 4%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 61 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 44 21%
Social Sciences 23 11%
Environmental Science 20 10%
Engineering 18 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 5%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 75 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,655,858
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal
#18
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,084
of 136,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them