↓ Skip to main content

7. 尿素の合成と生気論 : ヴェーラーの尿素合成は生気論を打ち破ったか(化学史・常識のウソ)

Overview of attention for article published in CHEMISTRY & EDUCATION, August 1987
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 265)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
7. 尿素の合成と生気論 : ヴェーラーの尿素合成は生気論を打ち破ったか(化学史・常識のウソ)
Published in
CHEMISTRY & EDUCATION, August 1987
DOI 10.20665/kakyoshi.35.4_332
Authors

竹林 松二

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,401,876
of 25,503,365 outputs
Outputs from CHEMISTRY & EDUCATION
#36
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,192
of 11,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEMISTRY & EDUCATION
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,503,365 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.