↓ Skip to main content

エマージングリスクとしてのCOVID-19―科学と政策の間のギャップを埋めるには―

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
エマージングリスクとしてのCOVID-19―科学と政策の間のギャップを埋めるには―
Published in
Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis, May 2020
DOI 10.11447/sraj.29.237
Authors

岸本 充生

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 47%
Other 2 13%
Librarian 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 40%
Environmental Science 2 13%
Engineering 2 13%
Chemistry 2 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,098,278
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis
#2
of 23 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,407
of 410,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Risk Analysis
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one scored the same or higher as 21 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them