↓ Skip to main content

Positive feelings facilitate working memory and complex decision making among older adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cognition and Emotion, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Positive feelings facilitate working memory and complex decision making among older adults
Published in
Cognition and Emotion, July 2012
DOI 10.1080/02699931.2012.698251
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie M. Carpenter, Ellen Peters, Daniel Västfjäll, Alice M. Isen

Abstract

The impact of induced mild positive feelings on working memory and complex decision making among older adults (aged 63-85) was examined. Participants completed a computer administered card task in which participants could win money if they chose from "gain" decks and lose money if they chose from "loss" decks. Individuals in the positive-feeling condition chose better than neutral-feeling participants and earned more money overall. Participants in the positive-feeling condition also demonstrated improved working-memory capacity. These effects of positive-feeling induction have implications for affect theory, as well as, potentially, practical implications for people of all ages dealing with complex decisions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 139 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 27%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Researcher 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 64 44%
Neuroscience 10 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 35 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2015.
All research outputs
#1,601,876
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cognition and Emotion
#195
of 1,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,045
of 177,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognition and Emotion
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.