↓ Skip to main content

Research–practice interactions as reported in recent design studies: still promising, still hazy

Overview of attention for article published in Educational technology research and development, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Research–practice interactions as reported in recent design studies: still promising, still hazy
Published in
Educational technology research and development, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11423-012-9261-6
Authors

Bart J. B. Ormel, Natalie N. Pareja Roblin, Susan E. McKenney, Joke M. Voogt, Jules M. Pieters

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 7%
Sweden 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 152 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 13%
Student > Master 16 10%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 81 49%
Arts and Humanities 14 8%
Psychology 11 7%
Mathematics 9 5%
Computer Science 6 4%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 28 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2014.
All research outputs
#6,533,860
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Educational technology research and development
#231
of 1,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,074
of 166,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational technology research and development
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.