↓ Skip to main content

Use of support vector machines for disease risk prediction in genome‐wide association studies: Concerns and opportunities

Overview of attention for article published in Human Mutation, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Use of support vector machines for disease risk prediction in genome‐wide association studies: Concerns and opportunities
Published in
Human Mutation, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/humu.22161
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florian Mittag, Finja Büchel, Mohamad Saad, Andreas Jahn, Claudia Schulte, Zoltan Bochdanovits, Javier Simón‐Sánchez, Mike A. Nalls, Margaux Keller, Dena G. Hernandez, J. Raphael Gibbs, Suzanne Lesage, Alexis Brice, Peter Heutink, Maria Martinez, Nicholas W Wood, John Hardy, Andrew B. Singleton, Andreas Zell, Thomas Gasser, Manu Sharma

Abstract

The success of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in deciphering the genetic architecture of complex diseases has fueled the expectations whether the individual risk can also be quantified based on the genetic architecture. So far, disease risk prediction based on top-validated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) showed little predictive value. Here, we applied a support vector machine (SVM) to Parkinson disease (PD) and type 1 diabetes (T1D), to show that apart from magnitude of effect size of risk variants, heritability of the disease also plays an important role in disease risk prediction. Furthermore, we performed a simulation study to show the role of uncommon (frequency 1-5%) as well as rare variants (frequency <1%) in disease etiology of complex diseases. Using a cross-validation model, we were able to achieve predictions with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of ~0.88 for T1D, highlighting the strong heritable component (∼90%). This is in contrast to PD, where we were unable to achieve a satisfactory prediction (AUC ~0.56; heritability ~38%). Our simulations showed that simultaneous inclusion of uncommon and rare variants in GWAS would eventually lead to feasible disease risk prediction for complex diseases such as PD. The used software is available at http://www.ra.cs.uni-tuebingen.de/software/MACLEAPS/.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Germany 3 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 121 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 29%
Researcher 23 18%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 19%
Computer Science 21 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 12%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 24 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2013.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Human Mutation
#2,103
of 2,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,097
of 179,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Mutation
#10
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,982 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.