↓ Skip to main content

A critique of Stewart’s approach: the chemical mechanism of dilutional acidosis

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
A critique of Stewart’s approach: the chemical mechanism of dilutional acidosis
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00134-009-1528-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Doberer, Georg-Christian Funk, Karl Kirchner, Bruno Schneeweiss

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 2%
Spain 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 74 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 16 20%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Postgraduate 9 11%
Professor 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 22 27%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 72%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,797,269
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,033
of 4,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,610
of 110,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.