You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical Genetics Lacks Standard Definitions and Protocols for the Collection and Use of Diversity Measures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Human Genetics, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.05.005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alice B. Popejoy, Kristy R. Crooks, Stephanie M. Fullerton, Lucia A. Hindorff, Gillian W. Hooker, Barbara A. Koenig, Natalie Pino, Erin M. Ramos, Deborah I. Ritter, Hannah Wand, Matt W. Wright, Michael Yudell, James Y. Zou, Sharon E. Plon, Carlos D. Bustamante, Kelly E. Ormond, Clinical Genome Resource Ancestry and Diversity Working Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | 33% |
| Canada | 5 | 7% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Israel | 2 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 45% |
| Scientists | 33 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 18 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2022.
All research outputs
#575,687
of 25,635,728 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#261
of 5,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,067
of 434,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#6
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,635,728 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.