↓ Skip to main content

Self-referential and anxiety-relevant information processing in subclinical social anxiety: an fMRI study

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Self-referential and anxiety-relevant information processing in subclinical social anxiety: an fMRI study
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11682-012-9188-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Abraham, Carolin Kaufmann, Ronny Redlich, Andrea Hermann, Rudolf Stark, Stephan Stevens, Christiane Hermann

Abstract

The fear of negative evaluation is one of the hallmark features of social anxiety. Behavioral evidence thus far largely supports cognitive models which postulate that information processing biases in the face of socially relevant information are a key factor underlying this widespread phobia. So far only one neuroimaging study has explicitly focused on the fear of negative evaluation in social anxiety where the brain responses of social phobics were compared to healthy participants during the processing of self-referential relative to other-referential criticism, praise or neutral information. Only self-referential criticism led to stronger activations in emotion-relevant regions of the brain, such as the amygdala and medial prefrontal cortices (mPFC), in the social phobics. The objective of the current study was to determine whether these findings could be extended to subclinical social anxiety. In doing so, the specificity of this self-referential bias was also examined by including both social and non-social (physical illness-related) threat information as well as a highly health anxious control group in the experimental paradigm. The fMRI findings indicated that the processing of emotional stimuli was accompanied by activations in the amygdala and the ventral mPFC, while self-referential processing was associated with activity in regions such as the mPFC, posterior cingulate and temporal poles. Despite the validation of the paradigm, the results revealed that the previously reported behavioral and brain biases associated with social phobia could not be unequivocally extended to subclinical social anxiety. The divergence between the findings is explored in detail with reference to paradigm differences and conceptual issues.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 135 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 19%
Student > Master 23 16%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 72 51%
Neuroscience 13 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 31 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2013.
All research outputs
#12,857,407
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#443
of 1,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,306
of 164,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.