↓ Skip to main content

Parents’ Perspectives on Participating in Genetic Research in Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Parents’ Perspectives on Participating in Genetic Research in Autism
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10803-012-1592-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magan Trottier, Wendy Roberts, Irene Drmic, Stephen W. Scherer, Rosanna Weksberg, Cheryl Cytrynbaum, David Chitayat, Cheryl Shuman, Fiona A. Miller

Abstract

Genetic research in autism depends on the willingness of individuals with autism to participate; thus, there is a duty to assess participants' needs in the research process. We report on families' motives and expectations related to their participation in autism genetic research. Respondents valued having a genetic result, as it alleviates guilt, promotes awareness, and may be used to tailor interventions and for family planning. The act of participating was distinctly significant, as it provided personal control, a connection to autism experts, networking with families, and hope for the future. The results of this study highlight complex factors involved in families' decisions to participate in autism genetic research and provide points to consider for this population of research participants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 94 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 6 6%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 21 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 12%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 24 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2012.
All research outputs
#14,954,534
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3,697
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,966
of 166,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#44
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.