↓ Skip to main content

森林総合研究所(茨城県つくば市)構内におけるチョウ類群集の20年間の変化

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Entomology (New Series), December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 104)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
森林総合研究所(茨城県つくば市)構内におけるチョウ類群集の20年間の変化
Published in
Japanese Journal of Entomology (New Series), December 2018
DOI 10.20848/kontyu.21.4_211
Authors

井上 大成

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2020.
All research outputs
#15,179,141
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Entomology (New Series)
#49
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,585
of 445,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Entomology (New Series)
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,461 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them