| Title |
Medical Students' Views on Peer Assessment of Professionalism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, June 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0162.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Louise Arnold, Carolyn K. Shue, Barbara Kritt, Shiphra Ginsburg, David T. Stern |
| Abstract |
Although peer assessment holds promise for assessing professionalism, reluctance and refusal to participate have been noted among learners and practicing physicians. Understanding the perspectives of potential participants may therefore be important in designing and implementing effective peer assessment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 138 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 49 | 34% |
| Unknown | 27 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 49% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 35 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2012.
All research outputs
#14,784,344
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#5,287
of 8,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,251
of 66,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#51
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.