| Title |
Clinical benefit of remdesivir in rhesus macaques infected with SARS-CoV-2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-2423-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brandi N. Williamson, Friederike Feldmann, Benjamin Schwarz, Kimberly Meade-White, Danielle P. Porter, Jonathan Schulz, Neeltje van Doremalen, Ian Leighton, Claude Kwe Yinda, Lizzette Pérez-Pérez, Atsushi Okumura, Jamie Lovaglio, Patrick W. Hanley, Greg Saturday, Catharine M. Bosio, Sarah Anzick, Kent Barbian, Tomas Cihlar, Craig Martens, Dana P. Scott, Vincent J. Munster, Emmie de Wit |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 446 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 79 | 18% |
| Spain | 24 | 5% |
| India | 16 | 4% |
| Japan | 15 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 3% |
| Canada | 12 | 3% |
| Mexico | 8 | 2% |
| Brazil | 8 | 2% |
| Chile | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 72 | 16% |
| Unknown | 191 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 324 | 73% |
| Scientists | 86 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 680 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 680 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 88 | 13% |
| Researcher | 84 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 70 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 10% |
| Other | 39 | 6% |
| Other | 110 | 16% |
| Unknown | 221 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 123 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 80 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 60 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 39 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 33 | 5% |
| Other | 110 | 16% |
| Unknown | 235 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 769. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2024.
All research outputs
#25,787
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#2,442
of 98,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,202
of 434,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#114
of 964 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 964 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.