| Title |
Status, trends and drivers of kelp forests in Europe: an expert assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-016-1141-7 |
| Authors |
R. M. Araújo, J. Assis, R. Aguillar, L. Airoldi, I. Bárbara, I. Bartsch, T. Bekkby, H. Christie, D. Davoult, S. Derrien-Courtel, C. Fernandez, S. Fredriksen, F. Gevaert, H. Gundersen, A. Le Gal, L. Lévêque, N. Mieszkowska, K. M. Norderhaug, P. Oliveira, A. Puente, J. M. Rico, E. Rinde, H. Schubert, E. M. Strain, M. Valero, F. Viard, I. Sousa-Pinto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Norway | 4 | 22% |
| Sweden | 4 | 22% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Portugal | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 78% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 310 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 303 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 62 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 12% |
| Unknown | 60 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 99 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 81 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Unknown | 79 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,791,743
of 24,715,720 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#243
of 2,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,066
of 344,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#5
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,715,720 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.