↓ Skip to main content

CFD for wastewater treatment: an overview

Overview of attention for article published in Water Science & Technology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CFD for wastewater treatment: an overview
Published in
Water Science & Technology, May 2016
DOI 10.2166/wst.2016.249
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. W. Samstag, J. J. Ducoste, A. Griborio, I. Nopens, D. J. Batstone, J. D. Wicks, S. Saunders, E. A. Wicklein, G. Kenny, J. Laurent

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 207 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 22%
Student > Master 31 15%
Researcher 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 12 6%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 43 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 78 37%
Environmental Science 22 11%
Chemical Engineering 20 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 1%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 63 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,376,252
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Water Science & Technology
#2,047
of 2,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,441
of 338,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Science & Technology
#20
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,968 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.