↓ Skip to main content

Transcription Factor NF-κB: An Update on Intervention Strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Transcription Factor NF-κB: An Update on Intervention Strategies
Published in
Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00005-016-0405-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arvind Panday, Maria Eugenia Inda, Prathyusha Bagam, Malaya K. Sahoo, Diana Osorio, Sanjay Batra

Abstract

The nuclear factor (NF)-κB family of transcription factors are ubiquitous and pleiotropic molecules that regulate the expression of more than 150 genes involved in a broad range of processes including inflammation, immunity, cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. The chronic activation or dysregulation of NF-κB signaling is the central cause of pathogenesis in many disease conditions and, therefore, NF-κB is a major focus of therapeutic intervention. Because of this, understanding the relationship between NF-κB and the induction of various downstream signaling molecules is imperative. In this review, we provide an updated synopsis of the role of NF-κB in DNA repair and in various ailments including cardiovascular diseases, HIV infection, asthma, herpes simplex virus infection, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer. Furthermore, we also discuss the specific targets for selective inhibitors and future therapeutic strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 17%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 16 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 24 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2017.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis
#264
of 406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,694
of 352,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 406 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.