| Title |
Studies on Lichens of Mizoram, Northeast India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40011-015-0592-z |
| Authors |
A. R. Logesh, M. Chinlampianga, A. C. Shukla, D. K. Upreti |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 50% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,976,997
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences
#23
of 118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,881
of 266,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.