↓ Skip to main content

Improving the delivery of brief interventions for heavy drinking in primary health care: outcome results of the Optimizing Delivery of Health Care Intervention (ODHIN) five‐country cluster randomized…

Overview of attention for article published in Addiction, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving the delivery of brief interventions for heavy drinking in primary health care: outcome results of the Optimizing Delivery of Health Care Intervention (ODHIN) five‐country cluster randomized factorial trial
Published in
Addiction, July 2016
DOI 10.1111/add.13476
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Anderson, Preben Bendtsen, Fredrik Spak, Jillian Reynolds, Colin Drummond, Lidia Segura, Myrna N. Keurhorst, Jorge Palacio‐Vieira, Marcin Wojnar, Kathryn Parkinson, Joan Colom, Karolina Kłoda, Paolo Deluca, Begoña Baena, Dorothy Newbury‐Birch, Paul Wallace, Maud Heinen, Amy Wolstenholme, Ben van Steenkiste, Artur Mierzecki, Katarzyna Okulicz‐Kozaryn, Gaby Ronda, Eileen Kaner, Miranda G. H. Laurant, Simon Coulton, Toni Gual

Abstract

To test if training and support, financial reimbursement, and option of referring screen positive patients to an internet-based method of giving advice (eBI) can increase primary health care providers' delivery of AUDIT-C based screening and advice to heavy drinkers. Cluster randomized factorial trial with 12-week implementation and measurement period. Primary health care units (PHCU) in different locations throughout Catalonia, England, Netherlands, Poland and Sweden. 120 PHCU, 24 in each of Catalonia, England, Netherlands, Poland and Sweden. PHCUs were randomized to one of eight groups: care as usual, training and support (TS), financial reimbursement (FR), and eBI; paired combinations of TS, FR and eBI, and all of FR, TS and eBI. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of eligible adult (age 18+ years) patients screened during a 12-week implementation period. Secondary outcome measures were proportion of screen positive patients advised; and, proportion of consulting adult patients given an intervention (screening and advice to screen positives) during the same 12-week implementation period. During a 4-week baseline measurement period, 5.9 (95% CI 3.4 to 8.4) per 100 adult patients consulting per PHCU were screened for their alcohol consumption. Based on the factorial design, the ratio of the logged proportion screened during the 12-week implementation period was 1.48 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.95) in PHCU that received TS versus PHCU that did not receive TS; for FR, the ratio was2.00 (95% CI 1.56 to 2.56). The option of referral to eBI did not lead to a higher proportion of patients screened. The ratio for TS plus FR was2.34 (95% CI 1.77 to 3.10), and the ratio for TS plus FR plus eBI was1.68 (95% CI 1.11 to 2.53). Providing primary health care units with training, support and financial reimbursement for delivering AUDIT-C based screening and advice to heavy drinkers increases screening for alcohol consumption. Providing primary health care units with the option of referring screen positive patients to an internet-based method of giving advice does not appear to increase screening for alcohol consumption. (†) Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov. Trial identifier: NCT01501552.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 155 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 22%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Master 12 8%
Other 11 7%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 37 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 29%
Psychology 31 20%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 39 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,655,983
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Addiction
#1,778
of 6,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,551
of 379,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction
#37
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.