| Title |
Challenges and solutions for networking knowledge holders and better informing decision-making on biodiversity and ecosystem services
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-016-1124-8 |
| Authors |
Carsten Nesshöver, Barbara Livoreil, Stefan Schindler, Marie Vandewalle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 32% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 11 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2018.
All research outputs
#5,629,250
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#856
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,826
of 358,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#27
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.