Title |
Factors predicting recurrence of chronic subdural haematoma: the influence of intraoperative irrigation and low-molecular-weight heparin thromboprophylaxis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Neurochirurgica, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00701-012-1334-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yasemin Tahsim-Oglou, Kerim Beseoglu, Daniel Hänggi, Walter Stummer, Hans-Jakob Steiger |
Abstract |
Burr-hole drainage has become the accepted treatment of choice for chronic subdural haematoma (cSDH), although still burdened with a major recurrence rate. The current analysis was initiated to determine management-related risk factors for recurrence, i.e. postoperative low-molecular-weight heparin thromboprophylaxis, and the importance of rinsing the subdural space. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 57 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 9 | 15% |
Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 12% |
Researcher | 5 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Other | 13 | 22% |
Unknown | 12 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 58% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,751,316
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#499
of 1,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,416
of 161,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,904 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.