| Title |
Governance options for science–policy interfaces on biodiversity and ecosystem services: comparing a network versus a platform approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-016-1132-8 |
| Authors |
Christoph Görg, Heidi Wittmer, Caitriona Carter, Esther Turnhout, Marie Vandewalle, Stefan Schindler, Barbara Livorell, Alexandra Lux |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 17% |
| South Africa | 1 | 8% |
| Finland | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 29 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2016.
All research outputs
#5,344,805
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#802
of 2,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,441
of 358,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#25
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,647 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.